Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support selection of source file names also for other export formats than make rules #7558

Closed
vicuna opened this issue Jun 17, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@vicuna
Copy link

vicuna commented Jun 17, 2017

Original bug ID: 7558
Reporter: @elfring
Status: acknowledged (set by @xavierleroy on 2017-06-22T18:07:45Z)
Resolution: open
Priority: normal
Severity: feature
Version: 4.03.0
Category: tools (ocaml{lex,yacc,dep,debug,...})
Related to: #7576
Parent of: #7559 #7560

Bug description

The description for the parameter “-modules” of the tool “ocamldep” contains the following information.

“Output raw dependencies of the form …, but these names are not resolved to source file names.”

I would appreciate if referenced OCaml modules could be exported with their names resolved to appropriate paths.
How are the chances to offer another data export variant there?

Additional information

It seems that such name conversion is only performed for make file rules so far.

@elfring
Copy link

elfring commented Apr 15, 2019

I am still curious how affected software components will be improved also for this issue.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented May 8, 2020

This issue has been open one year with no activity. Consequently, it is being marked with the "stale" label. What this means is that the issue will be automatically closed in 30 days unless more comments are added or the "stale" label is removed. Comments that provide new information on the issue are especially welcome: is it still reproducible? did it appear in other contexts? how critical is it? etc.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label May 8, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this as completed Jun 8, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants