|Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account||2018-08-16 04:16 CEST|
|Main | My View | View Issues | Change Log | Roadmap|
|View Issue Details|
|ID||Project||Category||View Status||Date Submitted||Last Update|
|0007720||OCaml||standard library||public||2018-02-02 18:34||2018-06-10 10:56|
|Target Version||Fixed in Version|
|Summary||0007720: Format: spurious space at end of line|
Format.set_margin 10; Format.printf "@[@[123456@ @[A@]@ B@]@]@\n";;
where = denotes a spurious space.
I am also wondering why A was not put at the end of the first line. (Removing the box around A does so. Removing one of the outer boxes does so too. Removing B does so too.) I guess the two issues are related.
|Tags||No tags attached.|
The space at the end of the line is not spurious from the point of view of Format's implementation.
This is due to the fact that "Format.set_margin 10" also sets the maximum indentation limit to 5. Consequently, the second box is rejected to the left with a forced new line. Since the break is introduced by the opening of the box, the previous break hint "@ " is printed as a space.
The easiest fix in this situation is to also adjust the maximum indentation limit:
Format.set_margin 10; Format.set_max_indent 8;
Format.printf "@[@[123456@ @[A@]@ B@]@]@\n";;
displays the expected output
Similarly, the difference in behavior that you observed by shortening the length of the format string is due to the fact that when the content of a box fits on a line, all formatting indication (and the maximum indentation limit) are ignored because the box is replaced by a fits box.
|There is something I am missing. The documentation of set_max_indent says: "once this limit is reached, new pretty-printing boxes are rejected to the left, if they do not fit on the current line." But the box containing A does fit on the line. So why would it be rejected to the left?|
You are right, there is a mismatch between the documentation and the implementation here: the rejection to the left happens if the *parent* box does not fit on the line, i.e.
"once this limit is reached, new pretty-printing boxes are rejected to the left, if their parent box do not fit on the current line."
I have proposed a documentation fix at https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/pull/1596. [^]
Do you wish to be mentionned as a reporter, and if yes under which name?
|2018-02-02 18:34||gmelquiond||New Issue|
|2018-02-02 19:03||octachron||Note Added: 0018864|
|2018-02-02 19:16||gmelquiond||Note Added: 0018865|
|2018-02-02 19:23||octachron||Note Added: 0018866|
|2018-02-03 11:54||octachron||Note Added: 0018867|
|2018-02-04 18:24||octachron||Assigned To||=> octachron|
|2018-02-04 18:24||octachron||Status||new => assigned|
|2018-06-10 10:56||octachron||Relationship added||has duplicate 0007804|
|Copyright © 2000 - 2011 MantisBT Group|