You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In OCamlWin when you call read_line (), and push enter - it should return empty
string, or if you enter only one letter and push enter - it should return
string
of length 1.
But in both cases it returns string of length 2.
When you try to open a file in OCamlWin witch name starts for example
from 'r' like read.ml it calls directive like this:
#use "C:\OCaml\read.ml";;
\r is interpreted like \013, and there is an error message.
When you use in OcamlWin copy & paste on multiline source you have to push
enter on each line, i propose to change OcamlWin to "Python Shell" style.
I mean that when you paste sth. \n is interpreted like Enter.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Original bug ID: 814
Reporter: administrator
Status: closed
Resolution: fixed
Priority: normal
Severity: feature
Category: ~DO NOT USE (was: OCaml general)
Bug description
Full_Name: Lukasz Lew
Version: 3.04
OS: Win 2000
Submission from: 54-dzi-3.acn.waw.pl (62.121.66.54)
In OCamlWin when you call read_line (), and push enter - it should return empty
string, or if you enter only one letter and push enter - it should return
string
of length 1.
But in both cases it returns string of length 2.
When you try to open a file in OCamlWin witch name starts for example
from 'r' like read.ml it calls directive like this:
#use "C:\OCaml\read.ml";;
\r is interpreted like \013, and there is an error message.
When you use in OcamlWin copy & paste on multiline source you have to push
enter on each line, i propose to change OcamlWin to "Python Shell" style.
I mean that when you paste sth. \n is interpreted like Enter.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: