<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<!DOCTYPE message PUBLIC
  "-//MLarc//DTD MLarc output files//EN"
  "../../mlarc.dtd"[
  <!ATTLIST message
    listname CDATA #REQUIRED
    title CDATA #REQUIRED
  >
]>

  <?xml-stylesheet href="../../mlarc.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>


<message 
  url="2002/07/1eb354ae665e672f9daf6153184dec66"
  from="Harry Chomsky &lt;harry@c...&gt;"
  author="Harry Chomsky"
  date="2002-07-11T18:49:41"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Status of callback_exn bug"
  prev="2002/07/29c34bf5bd36accb6baa9afd96dae97c"
  next="2002/07/e4a8636034edb61bf70f7a2a3638fc33"
  prev-in-thread="2002/07/29c34bf5bd36accb6baa9afd96dae97c"
  prev-thread="2002/07/b3015ae26296250e542fe692c8922683"
  next-thread="2002/07/f73aa69f24206e81ba402635bcb20ea7"
  root="../../"
  period="month"
  listname="caml-list"
  title="Archives of the Caml mailing list">

<thread subject="[Caml-list] Status of callback_exn bug">
<msg 
  url="2002/07/29c34bf5bd36accb6baa9afd96dae97c"
  from="Harry Chomsky &lt;harry@c...&gt;"
  author="Harry Chomsky"
  date="2002-07-11T17:28:05"
  subject="[Caml-list] Status of callback_exn bug">
<msg 
  url="2002/07/1eb354ae665e672f9daf6153184dec66"
  from="Harry Chomsky &lt;harry@c...&gt;"
  author="Harry Chomsky"
  date="2002-07-11T18:49:41"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Status of callback_exn bug">
</msg>
</msg>
</thread>

<contents>
Never mind -- I see that the problem has just been fixed!

----- Original Message -----
From: "Harry Chomsky" &lt;harry@chomsky.net&gt;
To: "Caml-list" &lt;caml-list@inria.fr&gt;
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 10:28 AM
Subject: [Caml-list] Status of callback_exn bug


&gt; With all the talk about an upcoming release of OCaml 3.05, I thought I
&gt; should ask once more if anybody knows about the status of the callback_exn
&gt; bug that was reported on April 12, 2002 in
&gt;
&gt; http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200204/msg00065.html
&gt;
&gt; The CVS shows that a change was made to byterun/interp.c on that date,
which
&gt; appears to be intended to fix the problem, but for me the problem remains
&gt; even with this fix.  Is it possible that version 3.05 will really fix the
&gt; problem?  If there's still more tweaking to be done, is it possible that
it
&gt; could get done in time to be included in the release?
&gt;
&gt; Thanks,
&gt; Harry
&gt;
&gt;
&gt; -------------------
&gt; To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives:
http://caml.inria.fr
&gt; Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ:
http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
&gt; Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
&gt;

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners

</contents>

</message>

