]> Hi berke@altern.org wrote: > > I agree. I agree with you both. Though I succeeded in recompiling the _full_ CDK both on Solaris and Linux (never tried win32), it doesn't even approach the ease and integratedness of Python(+distutils). Though the collection itself is of course great. Alexander I experienced similar problems with CDK. I just wanted > the X11 code. Had lot of problems, I thought that it didn't > like OpenBSD, I tried on Linux. Also, having to recompile Ocaml > isn't very convenient, and it's tricky to compile CDK with an > already compiled Ocaml (I didn't manage... I haven't spent a full > week on it, though). > > So I'd really like to have a CDK that compiles easily and cleanly on > a UNIX box, and that doesn't need a specific Ocaml version. I mean, > patching the compiler to install a X lib doesn't sound good to me. > -- > Berke > > ------------------- > To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners