]> Claudio Sacerdoti Coen wrote: > To sum up, IMHO solutions 1-3 are different and solve different problems. > 4 is not so promising as it seems. Finally it is nice to see some > interest in this field in the ocaml community. I more or less agree with you. I would like to be able to process XML documents in the most efficient way possible (which implies using O'Caml :-) ), while taking advantage of the currently available *standard* technology (XSLT, XPath). Let me restate my primary request: is anyone interested in constituting an XML/O'Caml task force, for the sake of defining and implementing the official O'Caml XML processing API / tools. I volunteer for it, but I will not take up the task by myself. Alex ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners