<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<!DOCTYPE message PUBLIC
  "-//MLarc//DTD MLarc output files//EN"
  "../../mlarc.dtd"[
  <!ATTLIST message
    listname CDATA #REQUIRED
    title CDATA #REQUIRED
  >
]>

  <?xml-stylesheet href="../../mlarc.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>


<message 
  url="2002/07/931a2b1570d2337011ffbde0d42f8498"
  from="Jeff Henrikson &lt;jehenrik@y...&gt;"
  author="Jeff Henrikson"
  date="2002-07-26T05:30:48"
  subject="[Caml-list] print exception unravel in toplevel?"
  prev="2002/07/d05ae36b4009e6467ab13a7926deac7c"
  next="2002/07/9ebc75a4b483b9b55cff6a06ff4adf6e"
  prev-thread="2002/07/d05ae36b4009e6467ab13a7926deac7c"
  next-thread="2002/07/9ebc75a4b483b9b55cff6a06ff4adf6e"
  root="../../"
  period="month"
  listname="caml-list"
  title="Archives of the Caml mailing list">

<thread subject="[Caml-list] print exception unravel in toplevel?">
<msg 
  url="2002/07/931a2b1570d2337011ffbde0d42f8498"
  from="Jeff Henrikson &lt;jehenrik@y...&gt;"
  author="Jeff Henrikson"
  date="2002-07-26T05:30:48"
  subject="[Caml-list] print exception unravel in toplevel?">
</msg>
</thread>

<contents>
Is there a way to get unhandled exception stack backtracing
turned on in the toplevel?  If not, can it please be added
to a feature wish list?  I presume the hypothetical change
would be an easy thing to do.  Just
#print_exception_backtrace bool;; or whatever. It seems like
a natural enough thing to incorporate.  Backtrace on ctrl-c
would be nice too if it were easy.


Jeff Henrikson


-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners

</contents>

</message>

