<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<!DOCTYPE message PUBLIC
  "-//MLarc//DTD MLarc output files//EN"
  "../../mlarc.dtd"[
  <!ATTLIST message
    listname CDATA #REQUIRED
    title CDATA #REQUIRED
  >
]>

  <?xml-stylesheet href="../../mlarc.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>


<message 
  url="2002/07/ca2a3e0a12658384bdc94c4ad62eb59b"
  from="SooHyoung Oh &lt;shoh@d...&gt;"
  author="SooHyoung Oh"
  date="2002-07-16T00:26:39"
  subject="[Caml-list] Why toplevel SHOULD bytecode?"
  prev="2002/07/c97184ca9272fc14c7e26e7d28a7f6ca"
  next="2002/07/dc0f73cee705120e47f611b302d2229c"
  prev-thread="2002/07/2fe55408b32aa0c8bbfe694c2fc4d83a"
  next-thread="2002/07/fd9109e654634eac7716d0fce9775ef3"
  root="../../"
  period="month"
  listname="caml-list"
  title="Archives of the Caml mailing list">

<thread subject="[Caml-list] Why toplevel SHOULD bytecode?">
<msg 
  url="2002/07/ca2a3e0a12658384bdc94c4ad62eb59b"
  from="SooHyoung Oh &lt;shoh@d...&gt;"
  author="SooHyoung Oh"
  date="2002-07-16T00:26:39"
  subject="[Caml-list] Why toplevel SHOULD bytecode?">
</msg>
</thread>

<contents>
Hi, ocamlers!

I found something strange in toplevel code.
Why toplevel SHOULD be bytecode?

Is it not EASY to build native code toplevel?
If so, how can I make it?

---
SooHyoung Oh
tel: 02)583-8709, 042)861-8649
cell. phone: 011-453-4303
web: http://www.duonix.com


-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners

</contents>

</message>

