]> On Wednesday 24 July 2002 06:31 pm, sajuma@utu.fi wrote: > Anyway, problems in memory management and modularity > only appear when the programs become big. Usually big > programs are not written in two languages, so comparison > is hard. But the example of Horus vs. Ensemble shows that > there is very large improvement. Do you have links/references? (Although the fact that ML is more productive than C is quite believable to me) I found Horus/Ensemble web site. It looks like it has not been updated in 5 years[1] > [...] why are you using C++? It's very easy to give simple examples of when C++ is much more productive than C in programs defined by their I/O (If anyone needs such examples: a) reverse a file, b) reverse lines in a file c) /usr/bin/sort ). The situation seems to be different with O'Caml vs C++. Regards, Oleg [1] Maybe the complexity has cought up with them eventually :) ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners