<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<!DOCTYPE message PUBLIC
  "-//MLarc//DTD MLarc output files//EN"
  "../../mlarc.dtd"[
  <!ATTLIST message
    listname CDATA #REQUIRED
    title CDATA #REQUIRED
  >
]>

  <?xml-stylesheet href="../../mlarc.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>


<message 
  url="2002/07/dfb2e3873480e153819e5c5f603826f3"
  from="Alan Schmitt &lt;alan.schmitt@i...&gt;"
  author="Alan Schmitt"
  date="2002-07-05T08:36:22"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] The CDK looks marvelous... but..."
  prev="2002/07/00fb705ed9a16fca4d7ec6fcdd19a976"
  next="2002/07/9ef27ddc21bed28306035ffd3faf0846"
  prev-in-thread="2002/07/fd96e17392e942b917cc96c3fa5051c0"
  next-in-thread="2002/07/f9a079582029deb762c0fb1e7aed37e2"
  prev-thread="2002/07/742672565244316ae0d90aeefcf7d334"
  next-thread="2002/07/ba93793e4013c16d61a933798baf50a3"
  root="../../"
  period="month"
  listname="caml-list"
  title="Archives of the Caml mailing list">

<thread subject="[Caml-list] The CDK looks marvelous... but...">
<msg 
  url="2002/07/bdd946e270849705a3a7e2f39ff61625"
  from="Dave Mason &lt;dmason@s...&gt;"
  author="Dave Mason"
  date="2002-07-04T09:15:26"
  subject="[Caml-list] The CDK looks marvelous... but...">
<msg 
  url="2002/07/ef50109a30eeae2684c3e9dc0c9b6aeb"
  from="Dave Mason &lt;dmason@s...&gt;"
  author="Dave Mason"
  date="2002-07-04T14:54:56"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] The CDK looks marvelous... but... ">
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2002/07/9804e96a031fcf6ded2001dc222513b8"
  from="Alan Schmitt &lt;alan.schmitt@i...&gt;"
  author="Alan Schmitt"
  date="2002-07-05T05:08:15"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] The CDK looks marvelous... but...">
<msg 
  url="2002/07/fd96e17392e942b917cc96c3fa5051c0"
  from="Alexander V. Voinov &lt;avv@q...&gt;"
  author="Alexander V. Voinov"
  date="2002-07-05T05:36:22"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] The CDK looks marvelous... but...">
<msg 
  url="2002/07/dfb2e3873480e153819e5c5f603826f3"
  from="Alan Schmitt &lt;alan.schmitt@i...&gt;"
  author="Alan Schmitt"
  date="2002-07-05T08:36:22"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] The CDK looks marvelous... but...">
</msg>
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2002/07/f9a079582029deb762c0fb1e7aed37e2"
  from="Markus Mottl &lt;markus@o...&gt;"
  author="Markus Mottl"
  date="2002-07-05T09:08:30"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] The CDK looks marvelous... but...">
<msg 
  url="2002/07/eafbd035fc507a58c6fda5b07a8769f1"
  from="Xavier Leroy &lt;xavier.leroy@i...&gt;"
  author="Xavier Leroy"
  date="2002-07-05T14:02:52"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] The CDK looks marvelous... but...">
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</thread>

<contents>
* Alexander V. Voinov (avv@quasar.ipa.nw.ru) wrote:
&gt; Hi Alan,
&gt; 
&gt; Alan Schmitt wrote:
&gt; &gt; - make recompiling easy (in my dream world, when I recompile ocaml, I'd
&gt; &gt;   like to be able to recompile all the libraries and apps that depend on
&gt; &gt;   it with one command).
&gt; 
&gt; Again, _why_ do you want to recompile ocaml? Both me and Dave and Berke
&gt; emphasized that a key to the adoption of this intergrated kit is that it
&gt; compiles with the stock binary version of ocaml for the respective
&gt; platform. I can't understand the reason to have a special version of
&gt; ocaml for CDK.

What I meant was "when a new version of ocaml comes out, or when I want
to recompile ocaml from cvs, ...".

At the moment, each time I install a new version of ocaml, I need to
recompile all librairies that depend on the standard library if it has
changed a bit. Same thing if I get a new version of, say, lablgtk, with
all my gtk apps.

So I don't mean to have a special version of ocaml with any packaging
system, just to be able to handle dependencies among librairies.

Best,

Alan

-- 
The hacker: someone who figured things out and made something cool happen.
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners

</contents>

</message>

