Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] mixin modules paper and future?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2002-08-31 (18:05)
From: Michael Vanier <mvanier@c...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] objective caml and industry

> Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2002 17:13:43 +0400 (MSD)
> From: Vitaly Lugovsky <>
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Michael Vanier wrote:
> > Change takes time.  I think chasing after industry acceptance of ocaml is
> > the wrong strategy.
>  It already accepted functional programming. Look at what Microsoft 
> Research have done - isn't them represent the industry?

Microsoft has a research interest in functional programming.  Though that's
perhaps encouraging, it's a far cry from trying to promote FP as something
programmers should learn.  C# (which they do promote as something
programmers should learn) is a long, long way from FP.  Still, every little
bit helps.

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: