Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
RE: [Caml-list] Why are type functions postfix?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2002-08-13 (00:50)
From: artboreb@n...
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Why are type functions postfix? (Tim Freeman) wrote:

>In OCAML and other ML dialects I've used, you say:
>   let x: int ref = ref 3
>Is there any reason that type functions like the first "ref" are
>postfix, unlike function application like the second "ref" that is
In the revised syntax (Camlp4) that is:

value x : ref int = ref 3; (* ref prefixed on both sides *)

Arturo Borquez

Your favorite stores, helpful shopping tools and great gift ideas. Experience the convenience of buying online with Shop@Netscape!

Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Mail account today at

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: