]> >> First, it seems that there's no more development activities going on. >> Is that the case ? >Yes (that is, Chinese/Korean/... "yes". English "no"), there is no >more development of mlgtk. >> I prefer mlgtk to lablgtk since it is easier to use, easier to understand >> and generates more compact code(at least on AIX system). >I prefer it for these reasons too, but none of my current projects >needs a GUI, so it's difficult for me to keep finding time to >work on it. >> The other question is about reference counting. >> I looked at lablgtk source and saw that it implemented reference counting, >> but I cound not find any reference counting code in mlgtk. >That is because mlgtk is buggy, or at least because it only works >if used as intended. I started to understand how gtk's reference >counting was supposed to work just before I started to have no >more time available available for mlgtk, so I never had time >to fix this "bug". >> If it is not, is it because the developers decided that it was not >> necessary or it just wasn't implemented ? >It's more the second one :) but everything will work fine if you >don't try to free any gtk objects (and even if you do, it's >only a memory leak, you might never notice :) ). >Do you really need it, or are you asking just out of curiosity? >I could make an effort and implement it, if you need it (and >as Sven pointed out, the source is available :) ). Thanks for the answer. I was just curious. As for doing it myself, I don't think I know OCAML/GTK well enough to do the job :). Thanks again. Notes mail - SONGSU YUN/Fishkill/IBM@IBMUS VM mail - IBMUSM09(yuns) Internet mail - yuns@US.IBM.COM Dept.; 07CA Zip; 27A IMD EastFishkill Tie Line; 533-6582 Ext; 914-894-6582 ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners