]> Hi I recently started using OCAML and so far I like it, I think it deserves more attention than what it is getting now. I have a question about mlgtk. First, it seems that there's no more development activities going on. Is that the case ? I prefer mlgtk to lablgtk since it is easier to use, easier to understand and generates more compact code(at least on AIX system). So, I'd like to see more activities on mlgtk. The other question is about reference counting. I looked at lablgtk source and saw that it implemented reference counting, but I cound not find any reference counting code in mlgtk. If it is not, is it because the developers decided that it was not necessary or it just wasn't implemented ? Thanks. Notes mail - SONGSU YUN/Fishkill/IBM@IBMUS VM mail - IBMUSM09(yuns) Internet mail - yuns@US.IBM.COM Dept.; 07CA Zip; 27A IMD EastFishkill Tie Line; 533-6582 Ext; 914-894-6582 ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners