<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<!DOCTYPE message PUBLIC
  "-//MLarc//DTD MLarc output files//EN"
  "../../mlarc.dtd"[
  <!ATTLIST message
    listname CDATA #REQUIRED
    title CDATA #REQUIRED
  >
]>

  <?xml-stylesheet href="../../mlarc.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>


<message 
  url="2003/01/6396a50720af493ebecfe69e70d65210"
  from="Clemens Hintze &lt;ml-ocaml@q...&gt;"
  author="Clemens Hintze"
  date="2003-01-03T11:40:04"
  subject="[Caml-list] Re: speed"
  prev="2003/01/564b13bda6a36ad2f6b58a1b2caae8b7"
  next="2003/01/0c4ef0e894b828576d2829f4be49ccf7"
  prev-in-thread="2003/01/564b13bda6a36ad2f6b58a1b2caae8b7"
  next-in-thread="2003/01/0c4ef0e894b828576d2829f4be49ccf7"
  prev-thread="2003/01/48b807e3da767c9c00767bf580dd3d3c"
  next-thread="2003/01/d89aa4bddc31c6f04c1b3b3cc50d0853"
  root="../../"
  period="month"
  listname="caml-list"
  title="Archives of the Caml mailing list">

<thread subject="[Caml-list] speed">
<msg 
  url="2003/01/564b13bda6a36ad2f6b58a1b2caae8b7"
  from="onlyclimb &lt;onlyclimb@1...&gt;"
  author="onlyclimb"
  date="2003-01-03T08:01:16"
  subject="[Caml-list] speed">
<msg 
  url="2003/01/6396a50720af493ebecfe69e70d65210"
  from="Clemens Hintze &lt;ml-ocaml@q...&gt;"
  author="Clemens Hintze"
  date="2003-01-03T11:40:04"
  subject="[Caml-list] Re: speed">
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2003/01/0c4ef0e894b828576d2829f4be49ccf7"
  from="Noel Welsh &lt;noelwelsh@y...&gt;"
  author="Noel Welsh"
  date="2003-01-03T11:47:56"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] speed">
<msg 
  url="2003/01/5939290091b9aef1bbf2a819582f4646"
  from="Chet Murthy &lt;chet@w...&gt;"
  author="Chet Murthy"
  date="2003-01-03T12:46:02"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] speed ">
</msg>
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2003/01/7f3e0f0d40f2c3480534632092c477ce"
  from="Xavier Leroy &lt;xavier.leroy@i...&gt;"
  author="Xavier Leroy"
  date="2003-01-03T13:32:30"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] speed">
<msg 
  url="2003/01/5feeb124e6be296bb910526dd7e54fa5"
  from="Chet Murthy &lt;chet@w...&gt;"
  author="Chet Murthy"
  date="2003-01-03T14:39:21"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] speed ">
<msg 
  url="2003/01/1b59aa51ded51a144ef03855ffa0454f"
  from="Sven Luther &lt;luther@d...&gt;"
  author="Sven Luther"
  date="2003-01-03T14:53:44"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] speed">
<msg 
  url="2003/01/0f323657ee94c6b6ec75dd120b80acc1"
  from="Erol Akarsu &lt;eakarsu@c...&gt;"
  author="Erol Akarsu"
  date="2003-01-03T15:30:13"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] speed">
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2003/01/e671f63faa6e60a2d46808e7a5be3c21"
  from="Chet Murthy &lt;chet@w...&gt;"
  author="Chet Murthy"
  date="2003-01-03T14:40:28"
  subject="Coyote Gulch test in Caml (was Re: [Caml-list] speed )">
<msg 
  url="2003/01/84db8a13e8a42079be430c11235ea1b0"
  from="Shawn Wagner &lt;shawnw@s...&gt;"
  author="Shawn Wagner"
  date="2003-01-03T15:02:10"
  subject="Re: Coyote Gulch test in Caml (was Re: [Caml-list] speed )">
<msg 
  url="2003/01/99cd8b7b3ca0d9d001871a37a4eba80f"
  from="Oleg &lt;oleg_inconnu@m...&gt;"
  author="Oleg"
  date="2003-01-03T15:56:32"
  subject="Re: Coyote Gulch test in Caml (was Re: [Caml-list] speed )">
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2003/01/cfbfbda8c795246f69950e2e8ea00083"
  from="Xavier Leroy &lt;xavier.leroy@i...&gt;"
  author="Xavier Leroy"
  date="2003-01-04T18:31:20"
  subject="Re: Coyote Gulch test in Caml (was Re: [Caml-list] speed )">
<msg 
  url="2003/01/07ee33d3bd5bd0038b30b98207b154b7"
  from="Oleg &lt;oleg_inconnu@m...&gt;"
  author="Oleg"
  date="2003-01-18T22:50:01"
  subject="Re: Coyote Gulch test in Caml (was Re: [Caml-list] speed )">
<msg 
  url="2003/01/17988bbd59483df8228db980cf6789fe"
  from="Shawn Wagner &lt;shawnw@s...&gt;"
  author="Shawn Wagner"
  date="2003-01-18T23:40:31"
  subject="Re: Coyote Gulch test in Caml (was Re: [Caml-list] speed )">
<msg 
  url="2003/01/740ca05b3cb0c3e686a3998768c3564e"
  from="David Chase &lt;chase@w...&gt;"
  author="David Chase"
  date="2003-01-20T21:23:26"
  subject="Re: Coyote Gulch test in Caml (was Re: [Caml-list] speed )">
<msg 
  url="2003/01/9237a1295600c54fc49c20a8c1967a3f"
  from="Nickolay Semyonov-Kolchin &lt;snob@s...&gt;"
  author="Nickolay Semyonov-Kolchin"
  date="2003-01-20T23:51:44"
  subject="Re: Coyote Gulch test in Caml (was Re: [Caml-list] speed )">
<msg 
  url="2003/01/17b1dc91d01127781c5512160ebe2b0a"
  from="Brian Hurt &lt;brian.hurt@q...&gt;"
  author="Brian Hurt"
  date="2003-01-21T00:45:26"
  subject="Re: Coyote Gulch test in Caml (was Re: [Caml-list] speed )">
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2003/01/16f3332b61c5c9621ff8ca3d298d6272"
  from="David Chase &lt;chase@w...&gt;"
  author="David Chase"
  date="2003-01-21T13:09:12"
  subject="Re: Coyote Gulch test in Caml (was Re: [Caml-list] speed )">
<msg 
  url="2003/01/3e8e2b27f149125d2bc79f8f81f7238e"
  from="Daniel Andor &lt;da209@c...&gt;"
  author="Daniel Andor"
  date="2003-01-21T13:16:48"
  subject="Re: Coyote Gulch test in Caml (was Re: [Caml-list] speed )">
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2003/01/f781fbd10809682f5020b87923bff572"
  from="Nickolay Semyonov-Kolchin &lt;snob@s...&gt;"
  author="Nickolay Semyonov-Kolchin"
  date="2003-01-22T07:22:18"
  subject="Re: Coyote Gulch test in Caml (was Re: [Caml-list] speed )">
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2003/01/2e377a963ff1b981e10398add3c66047"
  from="Siegfried Gonzi &lt;siegfried.gonzi@s...&gt;"
  author="Siegfried Gonzi"
  date="2003-01-19T09:43:32"
  subject="Re: Coyote Gulch test in Caml (was Re: [Caml-list] speed )">
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2003/01/74a07e460d4553cfd41d33453e245700"
  from="Siegfried Gonzi &lt;siegfried.gonzi@s...&gt;"
  author="Siegfried Gonzi"
  date="2003-01-19T09:45:19"
  subject="Re: Coyote Gulch test in Caml (was Re: [Caml-list] speed )">
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2003/01/826f0fbaad9a50b70a73bc0e8f5f0fde"
  from="Xavier Leroy &lt;xavier.leroy@i...&gt;"
  author="Xavier Leroy"
  date="2003-01-21T09:56:51"
  subject="[Caml-list] Re: Coyote Gulch test in Caml">
<msg 
  url="2003/01/eea86615e9ca47c169bfb91694fa15f2"
  from="Brian Hurt &lt;brian.hurt@q...&gt;"
  author="Brian Hurt"
  date="2003-01-21T15:48:19"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Re: Coyote Gulch test in Caml">
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2003/01/32a48fbbe8cc060ff33f9088ef0b64c6"
  from="Daniel Andor &lt;da209@c...&gt;"
  author="Daniel Andor"
  date="2003-01-27T16:59:52"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Re: Coyote Gulch test in Caml">
<msg 
  url="2003/01/82d94403680b52187ef16b17c0a53ee4"
  from="Christian Lindig &lt;lindig@e...&gt;"
  author="Christian Lindig"
  date="2003-01-30T07:41:25"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Re: Coyote Gulch test in Caml">
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2003/01/1c1f2f0f451d19c581c4bdf0276d6994"
  from="Brian Hurt &lt;brian.hurt@q...&gt;"
  author="Brian Hurt"
  date="2003-01-05T01:05:00"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] speed">
<msg 
  url="2003/01/bf543fdffa5461b710cb9940d1260e33"
  from="Michael Vanier &lt;mvanier@c...&gt;"
  author="Michael Vanier"
  date="2003-01-05T20:17:34"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] speed">
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</thread>

<contents>
In mailing-list.ocaml, you wrote:
&gt; Is it normal that my ocaml program is only 2 times faster than the
&gt; java counterpart ?(using the same method and complied into native.
&gt; jdk is 1.4.1

I do not believe, that this is normal, to be expected, or general
case.  There are, for sure, programs that may be faster in Java than
in O'Caml. But those should be exceptions!

Also it could be, that you have a excellent written Java application,
using all performance improvements that are possible with Java and
comparing that against a poorly written O'Caml application using all
anti-performance improvements possible ;-)

Would you mind to post some code showing the performance difference? I
am very interested in that as I "sell" O'Caml as generally faster than
Java to some of my colleagues, and I do not want to be a story teller
;-)


Thanks in advance,
Clemens.

-- 
Clemens Hintze  mailto: c.hintze (at) gmx.net
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners

</contents>

</message>

