]> On Tue, Jul 29, 2003 at 10:44:58PM -0700, Jason Hickey wrote: > 2. This kind of exception re-raising does not work well with stack > tracing (OCAMLRUNPARAM=b). It would be very nice to add a "finally" > clause that did not interfere with stack tracing, or make it so that > re-raising would preserve the location where the exception was created. It looks to me like re-raising *does* preserve the location where the exception was created. My toy example: --8<-- raise.ml --- let f () = raise Not_found --8<--------------- --8<-- main.ml --- try Raise.f () with e -> raise e --8<-------------- % ocamlc -g -o go raise.ml go.ml % ./go Fatal error: exception Not_found Raised at module Raise, character 26 Called from module Main, character 14 Re-raised at module Main, character 32 I remember one of the developers mentioning this behavior in a discussion a while back. cheers, William ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners