]> On Thu, Oct 23, 2003 at 11:54:07PM -0700, Dustin Sallings wrote: > { 0: < > pb_counts = { "T1": 23, "T2": 43 } > pb_times = { "T1": 291, "T2": 92 } > > > 300: < > pb_counts = { "T1": 29, "T2": 50 } > pb_times = { "T1": 202, "T2": 87 } > > > } > > When I spell it out that way, it looks a little less than optimal. > However, this is more of a learning tool at this point. You may want to consider putting the data for a given transaction type into its own type, and having that be the target of the hashtbl. type transaction_info = { mutable counts : int; mutable times : int; } Then your results could just be a (int * (string, transaction_info) Hashtbl.t) list Dave BTW, this actually seems like a good problem for learning the language. I seem to always choose things too difficult, and end up getting frustrated. BTW, I have found the .mli files for the libraries to be the best documentation. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners