]> On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 11:14, Jacques Garrigue wrote: > Overall, I would not characterize ocaml objects as weak, but rather > nonintuitive. I found for basic use they're easy to use .. except for the long winded type names .. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners