]> Gentlemen! There are two features, which might it be useful to support in the language w/out modifying it much. And they both are about greater generality of the language. First, it would be nice to have constructors as functions like below: List. map Some [17] Second, it would also be nice not to have "the concept of constructor arity", and treat the code below as correct: type t = A of int * int let _ = match A (17, 0) with A z -> match z with (x, y) -> () Does anybody know, whether this is possible? Or, if not, what are the prohibiting reasons? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Serge S. Bityukov, Moscow State University, Dept of Mechanics and Mathematics ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners