<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<!DOCTYPE message PUBLIC
  "-//MLarc//DTD MLarc output files//EN"
  "../../mlarc.dtd"[
  <!ATTLIST message
    listname CDATA #REQUIRED
    title CDATA #REQUIRED
  >
]>

  <?xml-stylesheet href="../../mlarc.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>


<message 
  url="2003/11/4e5b55dd0ab15dd2c4921eafe1161d84"
  from="skaller &lt;skaller@o...&gt;"
  author="skaller"
  date="2003-11-02T16:08:00"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals"
  prev="2003/11/9615e7e31a4f909651225be4d94a035c"
  next="2003/11/04e387ee924398c00a5a96cd87e690df"
  prev-in-thread="2003/10/eb7cd1d58675f14a11da772da1f15578"
  next-in-thread="2003/11/04e387ee924398c00a5a96cd87e690df"
  prev-thread="2003/10/7a1d0d1df3a10032e044f94b7a97dc58"
  next-thread="2003/10/89daa7fd59e499b8d6e24c3bbae1909e"
  root="../../"
  period="month"
  listname="caml-list"
  title="Archives of the Caml mailing list">

<thread subject="[Caml-list] Int overflow in literals">
<msg 
  url="2003/10/32589dd80abb3734f897d4001f6b0798"
  from="Marcin &apos;Qrczak&apos; Kowalczyk &lt;qrczak@k...&gt;"
  author="Marcin &apos;Qrczak&apos; Kowalczyk"
  date="2003-10-30T13:53:38"
  subject="[Caml-list] Int overflow in literals">
<msg 
  url="2003/10/329e43152b4d6e7fe469e8388574a56c"
  from="Alex Baretta &lt;alex@b...&gt;"
  author="Alex Baretta"
  date="2003-10-30T17:37:52"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals">
<msg 
  url="2003/10/02243bece60cca6bd1ce2e86faebb27b"
  from="Frederic van der Plancke &lt;fvdp@d...&gt;"
  author="Frederic van der Plancke"
  date="2003-10-30T17:59:36"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals">
<msg 
  url="2003/10/16cf1119550bc482f61d8a175850278e"
  from="Oleg Trott &lt;oleg_trott@c...&gt;"
  author="Oleg Trott"
  date="2003-10-30T19:20:41"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals">
<msg 
  url="2003/10/e7fcc98c05c60dd534058a2b5b755835"
  from="Marcin &apos;Qrczak&apos; Kowalczyk &lt;qrczak@k...&gt;"
  author="Marcin &apos;Qrczak&apos; Kowalczyk"
  date="2003-10-30T19:40:19"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals">
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2003/10/d8c3fbc32e86e94e8ade943b11575559"
  from="Issac Trotts &lt;ijtrotts@u...&gt;"
  author="Issac Trotts"
  date="2003-10-30T19:56:17"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals">
<msg 
  url="2003/10/eb7cd1d58675f14a11da772da1f15578"
  from="Oleg Trott &lt;oleg_trott@c...&gt;"
  author="Oleg Trott"
  date="2003-10-30T21:15:25"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals">
<msg 
  url="2003/11/4e5b55dd0ab15dd2c4921eafe1161d84"
  from="skaller &lt;skaller@o...&gt;"
  author="skaller"
  date="2003-11-02T16:08:00"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals">
<msg 
  url="2003/11/04e387ee924398c00a5a96cd87e690df"
  from="Brian Hurt &lt;bhurt@s...&gt;"
  author="Brian Hurt"
  date="2003-11-02T16:22:37"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals">
<msg 
  url="2003/11/b454dcb9c7802c6cc90341d4f6aa93dd"
  from="Marcin &apos;Qrczak&apos; Kowalczyk &lt;qrczak@k...&gt;"
  author="Marcin &apos;Qrczak&apos; Kowalczyk"
  date="2003-11-02T16:39:07"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals">
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2003/11/e3b8f18d6ed983fac7eada29e2dd6c76"
  from="skaller &lt;skaller@o...&gt;"
  author="skaller"
  date="2003-11-07T08:23:37"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals">
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2003/10/6052deff2fa249f89ca03e7956cad582"
  from="Kenneth Knowles &lt;kknowles@u...&gt;"
  author="Kenneth Knowles"
  date="2003-10-30T21:28:42"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals">
<msg 
  url="2003/10/01c93c3b596bd48aae49b6a21497ec25"
  from="Jacques Garrigue &lt;garrigue@k...&gt;"
  author="Jacques Garrigue"
  date="2003-10-31T00:18:33"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals">
<msg 
  url="2003/10/6a6b72183aecc41c4e1860237ead3072"
  from="Kenneth Knowles &lt;kknowles@u...&gt;"
  author="Kenneth Knowles"
  date="2003-10-31T02:07:24"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals">
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2003/10/79116eaedef6aebf445400b42b5f4c4c"
  from="Frederic van der Plancke &lt;fvdp@d...&gt;"
  author="Frederic van der Plancke"
  date="2003-10-30T21:37:07"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals">
<msg 
  url="2003/10/987054b9224e2bd160c22abe44f48756"
  from="Issac Trotts &lt;ijtrotts@u...&gt;"
  author="Issac Trotts"
  date="2003-10-30T23:22:07"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals">
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2003/10/8f7f4d18c95a53d9fe2877b8acd0a6ad"
  from="Oleg Trott &lt;oleg_trott@c...&gt;"
  author="Oleg Trott"
  date="2003-10-30T23:44:35"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals">
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2003/10/83d907aa36714be69cdf730269e4a127"
  from="Xavier Leroy &lt;xavier.leroy@i...&gt;"
  author="Xavier Leroy"
  date="2003-10-31T16:56:31"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals">
<msg 
  url="2003/11/b9b1de506ba3963ebae3afdd7b32f688"
  from="skaller &lt;skaller@o...&gt;"
  author="skaller"
  date="2003-11-02T16:25:22"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals">
<msg 
  url="2003/11/44d8403aa5dcdbc1080f6c22e848b813"
  from="Marcin &apos;Qrczak&apos; Kowalczyk &lt;qrczak@k...&gt;"
  author="Marcin &apos;Qrczak&apos; Kowalczyk"
  date="2003-11-02T16:37:57"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals">
</msg>
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2003/10/3ee55fa5ad37f8f091b0847426676598"
  from="Marcin &apos;Qrczak&apos; Kowalczyk &lt;qrczak@k...&gt;"
  author="Marcin &apos;Qrczak&apos; Kowalczyk"
  date="2003-10-31T17:39:41"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals">
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2003/10/fbe703e603163a7f59b0105d784c2f43"
  from="Oleg Trott &lt;oleg_trott@c...&gt;"
  author="Oleg Trott"
  date="2003-10-31T17:51:22"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals">
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</thread>

<contents>
On Fri, 2003-10-31 at 08:14, Oleg Trott wrote:
&gt; On Thursday 30 October 2003 03:05 pm, Issac Trotts wrote:

&gt; 
&gt; Or, better yet, use Big_int:

Felix does that, and i'm very happy with the idea.
Constant folding is done in "infinite" precision.
The check for size, if done, would occur in the backend
code generator .. not the parser.


-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners

</contents>

</message>

