Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Int overflow in literals
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2003-11-02 (16:39)
From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@k...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Int overflow in literals
W li¶cie z nie, 02-11-2003, godz. 17:23, Brian Hurt pisze:

> This is a bad idea.  I'd like the constant folding to be done in the word 
> length that the code will be executed in- this way, there is no difference 
> between code that is executed at run time and code that is executed at 
> compile time.

Constant folding is different from interpreting literals.

   __("<         Marcin Kowalczyk

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: