<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<!DOCTYPE message PUBLIC
  "-//MLarc//DTD MLarc output files//EN"
  "../../mlarc.dtd"[
  <!ATTLIST message
    listname CDATA #REQUIRED
    title CDATA #REQUIRED
  >
]>

  <?xml-stylesheet href="../../mlarc.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>


<message 
  url="2003/11/fd0f1ccee25a666249fd8b99def103b8"
  from="Artem Prisyznuk &lt;tema@s...&gt;"
  author="Artem Prisyznuk"
  date="2003-11-04T14:54:26"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Right way to determine used syntax ( camlp4 )"
  prev="2003/11/fc711ff363ee98e5a52de94c646ee486"
  next="2003/11/2c0eec700da6320a17bcd3d2469d1a05"
  prev-in-thread="2003/11/a5e3d51ebade36d6991bf4b045e55347"
  prev-thread="2003/11/5bfc54158708ba55850a695ef7c3c554"
  next-thread="2003/11/7d1a89526a373d9c8ad55df4f4d4ad97"
  root="../../"
  period="month"
  listname="caml-list"
  title="Archives of the Caml mailing list">

<thread subject="[Caml-list] Right way to determine used syntax ( camlp4 )">
<msg 
  url="2003/11/26590f366f401c39cd62b82a784477dd"
  from="Artem Prisyznuk &lt;tema@s...&gt;"
  author="Artem Prisyznuk"
  date="2003-11-04T10:45:48"
  subject="[Caml-list] Right way to determine used syntax ( camlp4 )">
<msg 
  url="2003/11/a5e3d51ebade36d6991bf4b045e55347"
  from="Dmitry Lomov &lt;Dmitry.Lomov@i...&gt;"
  author="Dmitry Lomov"
  date="2003-11-04T13:07:24"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Right way to determine used syntax ( camlp4 )">
<msg 
  url="2003/11/fd0f1ccee25a666249fd8b99def103b8"
  from="Artem Prisyznuk &lt;tema@s...&gt;"
  author="Artem Prisyznuk"
  date="2003-11-04T14:54:26"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Right way to determine used syntax ( camlp4 )">
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</thread>

<contents>

  On Tue, 4 Nov 2003 15:59:53 +0300, Dmitry Lomov
  &lt;Dmitry.Lomov@intellij.com&gt; wrote:

&gt; Hi,
&gt;
&gt; I believe the best way is to have two separate syntax extension files,
&gt; and then just supply the right one (either for normal or
&gt; "revised" syntax) at compile time.

  Module has ~400 lines. Revised and normal verison differ in three lines.
  So I think make and maintance two different version no have sense.

&gt; What you propose has a strong hackish smell :)

  I smell it. Because I ask question. :-)

-- 
Artem Prysyznuk
tema@sit.kiev.ua

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners

</contents>

</message>

