]> On Dec 9, 2003, at 4:08, Remi Vanicat wrote: > why do you use Stream.empty ? it would be more natural to use only > Stream.next. As in : > let stream_convert source = > let chunk = ref (Stream.of_string (Stream.next source)) in > Stream.from (fun x -> > try > Some (Stream.next !chunk) > with > Stream.Failure -> > (* code needed when the chunk is empty *) > ) I think I considered that, but didn't explore that direction for some reason. I'll give that a shot. Overall, I'm looking for a bit less duplication. It just seems like the whole thing should be smaller, so I assume there's a better way. > By the way, your code make the assumption that no string in the source > stream are empty (look at what would happen in such case). Well, I believe that I will have no empty streams in my use case, but that's no excuse. Thanks for the pointers. -- Dustin Sallings ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners