English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] [ANN] The Missing Library
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2004-04-23 (22:00)
From: Maxence Guesdon <maxence.guesdon@i...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] The Missing Library
Dans son style inimitable, John Goerzen écrivait:

> > Sorry, the real start of the whole discussion is here:
> > http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200403/msg00091.html
> Got it.  We seem to be e-mailing past each other a bit here.
> Anyway, I've been reading that thread and haven't really seen anyone
> defending the standard library yet.  I found this message particularly
> compelling:
> http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200403/msg00166.html
> And Xavier's reply:
> http://caml.inria.fr/archives/200403/msg00171.html
> Which, if I may boil several pages down into a few characters, seems to
> say "We know it sucks, but don't have time to fix it quickly."  That
> does not translate, in my mind, to "your complaints are invalid", which
> is what you seem to be saying.  So I still don't understand where you're
> coming from.

I'm not saying "your complaints are invalid", i'm just (personnally) 
tired of always reading the same discussions again and again.

> All of which, though, is somewhat beside the point.  How are we going to
> *fix* it?

Why not start by merging your lib with Extlib ?

- m

To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners