Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] [ANN] The Missing Library
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2004-04-28 (13:04)
From: Richard Jones <rich@a...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Common IO structure
On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 01:58:00AM +0900, Yamagata Yoriyuki wrote:
> I'm interested in an emprical evidence, though.

I can't claim empirical evidence, but I do know that UTF-8
input/output is increasingly important to me.  We've moved to a model
where all the websites we're doing (even for UK customers) are UTF-8
throughout.  PostgreSQL is UNICODE, webserver serves UTF-8 pages, all
strings manipulated inside the Caml code are really UTF-8 strings
(although we rarely deal with them as anything other than pure bytes).
The only time we convert to other encodings is for handling stupid
mail systems like Hotmail which cannot deal with UTF-8.


Richard Jones.
Merjis Ltd. - improving website return on investment
"One serious obstacle to the adoption of good programming languages is
the notion that everything has to be sacrificed for speed. In computer
languages as in life, speed kills." -- Mike Vanier

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: