Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[Caml-list] Counting bits in a big_int
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2004-05-16 (00:51)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Counting bits in a big_int
On Sun, 2004-05-16 at 06:19, Yaron Minsky wrote:
> Nice.  The weird thing about the Nat module is that it's completely
> undocumented.  Is there any reason to think it wil be stable between
> revisions? 

Yes, the Ocaml people care about that.

>  For instance, does Xavier's reimplementation have the same
> Num module with the same interface as the previous one?

Yes. I've been using Nat for ages and had no problems
with upgrades.

> I guess my real question is: why is Nat undocumented?

Documentation requires work, its fairly easy to guess
what Nat does from the function names .. :)

John Skaller,
voice: 061-2-9660-0850, 
snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia
Checkout the Felix programming language

To unsubscribe, mail Archives:
Bug reports: FAQ:
Beginner's list: