English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
[Caml-list] interesting array efficiency observations
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2004-05-09 (00:25)
From: Christophe TROESTLER <Christophe.Troestler@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] interesting array efficiency observations
On Sun, 09 May 2004, Yamagata Yoriyuki <yoriyuki@mbg.ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
> From: briand@aracnet.com
> > I was investigating the use of 1-D bigarray's vs Array and noticed
> >  that the 1-D bigarray using c_layout seems to be slower than Array.
> Yes, it is expected, since a.{j} expands a call of a C function, while
> a.(j) expands inlined assembly codes.

Is it?  Ocamlopt does inline the call when the bigarray type is fully
known, doesn't it.


To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners