English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
Estimating the size of the ocaml community
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2005-02-13 (10:30)
From: Daniel Heck <dheck@i...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] The boon of static type checking
On Sun, 13 Feb 2005 03:12:03 +0100 (CET) Thomas Fischbacher wrote:

> > An obvious example is code reuse.  For certain application domains, like for 
> > instance, military simulation, many libraries of C++ code have been written.  
> > Thus, for military simulation, C++ would be a good choice for reducing time 
> > to market.
> Could you give a specific example, but *please* one that is not related to 
> killing people?

Having seen you start this very discussion on another mailing list,
would you *please* consider taking this question to a list that is
dedicated to C++, just for a change? Frankly, your only reason for
subscribing to this ML seems to be to extol the virtues of Lisp and to
bash C++, which is a nuisance for everyone who reads it in the hope of
learning about OCaml...