Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Immediate recursive functions
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2005-02-18 (08:54)
From: Alex Cowie <cowie@c...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Camlp4 documentation
Alex Baretta wrote:

> Martin Jambon wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Christian Szegedy wrote:
>>> Feel free to write your CamlP4 extension ;)
>> :-)
>> But there are few things to know/discover before starting.
>> Is anyone interested in a kind of highly practical tutorial on
>> how to extend the syntax of OCaml with Camlp4?
>> I could possibly start writing one if there is enough demand.
>> Martin
> Why yes! Yet, it's terribly sad that DdR chose to forcibly impose upon 
> the Camlp4 metaprogrammer to use the revised syntax. This is probably 
> the main obstacle, together with the relative lack of documentation, 
> to the diffusion of Camlp4, IMHO.
> Alex
For me, the use of revised syntax has been a disincentive to using 
Camlp4 metaprogramming.  I have always wondered whether a traditional 
syntax version of Camlp4 was technically feasible.  Any comments?

Alex Cowie

School of Computer and Information Science
University of South Australia