English version
Accueil     Ŕ propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis ŕ jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml ŕ l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
Does LablTk have a future?
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2005-09-04 (13:48)
From: Richard Jones <rich@a...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Feeding the OCaml GUI troll
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 10:39:41PM +1000, skaller wrote:
> The fact the control inverted (event driven) form
> is object oriented/procedural, yet equivalent to
> a purely functional algorithm, makes mechanical
> control inversion attractive -- but the utility
> is only apparent in more complex examples.

Another good example where it makes sense is in writing web servers.
Have a look at the source to (event-driven webserver) BOA sometime -
it's absolutely horrible.


Richard Jones, CTO Merjis Ltd.
Merjis - web marketing and technology - http://merjis.com
Team Notepad - intranets and extranets for business - http://team-notepad.com