Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Comparing two things of any two types, in pure OCaml
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2006-09-17 (09:45)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Improper generic equality in Caml (Rossberg's SML vs Caml)
On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 07:08 +0200, wrote:

> This problem can sometimes make translation from SML (which has Leibniz
> equality) 

It does? I'm curious how it handles

(a) functions
(b) abstract types

The former can't support other than physical equality
and the latter can only support value equality with a user
supplied routine.

John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: