Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Comparing two things of any two types, in pure OCaml
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2006-09-17 (12:43)
From: rossberg@p...
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Improper generic equality in Caml (Rossberg's SML vs Caml)
skaller wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 07:08 +0200, wrote:
>> This problem can sometimes make translation from SML (which has Leibniz
>> equality)
> It does? I'm curious how it handles
> (a) functions
> (b) abstract types

By statically ruling out the use of generic equality on them. That's the
purpose of eqtypes in SML.

For the latter, the implementor of the abstract type can choose to allow
generic equality if the abstract equality coincides with representational

Of course, this solution comes with its own set of problems...

Btw, SML'97 even goes as far as disallowing the use of generic equality on
floats, because IEEE equality does not meet the requirements. You have to
use a special operator Real.== to compare them.

- Andreas