Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Scripting in ocaml
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2006-12-23 (16:06)
From: Chad Perrin <perrin@a...>
Subject: Re: strong/weak typing terminology (was Re: [Caml-list] Scripting in ocaml)
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 01:58:12PM +0100, Daniel Bünzli wrote:
> Le 22 déc. 06 à 21:14, Chad Perrin a écrit :
> >In point of fact, there is a clear definition.
> And that is, unsurprisingly, your definition. Can you show me an  
> authoritative source to support your claims ?
> Anyway, this terminology is as spoiled as this discussion so it is  
> worth not using it.

Yeah, terminology sucks.  Let's abandon all terminology.

CCD CopyWrite Chad Perrin [ ]
"The first rule of magic is simple. Don't waste your time waving your
hands and hopping when a rock or a club will do." - McCloctnick the Lucid