Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
empty type
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2007-02-19 (22:37)
From: Richard Jones <rich@a...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] empty type
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 08:47:38AM -0500, Fernando Alegre wrote:
> Hi,
> I think this is a bug, but I'm not sure. I mistakenly defined type e using
> Haskell notation, and it was accepted. However, it shadowed the unit type.
> Can someone confirm whether this should be acceptable or not?

It tripped us up before:


Richard Jones
Red Hat UK Limited