English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
Teaching bottomline, part 3: what should improve.
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2007-05-23 (19:34)
From: Brian Hurt <bhurt@j...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Teaching bottomline, part 3: what should improve.
Robert C Fischer wrote:

> ...and locks and threads are not a viable long-term solution to the 
> problem of concurrency in general.  You're future-proofing enough by 
> teaching them functional languages: Erlang and Cilk are closer to the 
> needed future.
I think you mean "Haskell+STM" instead of Cilk.  Cilk isn't a 
particularly functional language (being effectively C plus a little bit).