Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Upgrading sexplib-2.7.0 to camlp4 3.10
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2007-05-01 (16:39)
From: Nicolas Pouillard <nicolas.pouillard@g...>
Subject: Re: Upgrading sexplib-2.7.0 to camlp4 3.10
On 5/1/07, Joel Reymont <> wrote:
> On May 1, 2007, at 5:27 PM, Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
> > However I suggest you comment that part and try to go further with
> > poly variants at a first glance.
> Are you saying that RfTag used to apply to regular variants?
> What about RfInh, how is that encoded now? Is this what you referred
> to as poly variants?

No, no, no there is still a difference between poly variants and classic ones.

When I wrote `id it's for polymorphic ones.

However there are now all in the same category: ctyp, so inherit is
useless since it was made to be able to inject a type name in a
polymorphic declaration.

Nicolas Pouillard