Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2007-08-02 (12:13)
From: Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+ocaml@m...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OcaML & UML
Ed Keith wrote:

> A potential client requires that the system be
> documented in UML, but do not specify what language it
> will be implemented in. I have used UML to document
> C++ and Java, and know UML is supposed to be
> implementation language independent, but am concerned
> that the impedance mismatch with Ocaml may make it
> impractical to combine UML and Ocaml. Any thoughts?

Well since UML is designed specifically for object modelling
and that the vast majority of Ocaml code I have seen and write
myself is functional rather than object oriented, this looks
like a match made in hell :-).

Erik de Castro Lopo
"I'd crawl over an acre of 'Visual This++' and 'Integrated
Development That' to get to gcc, Emacs, and gdb.  Thank you."
-- Vance Petree