Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
[ANN] coThreads 0.10
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2007-09-21 (18:04)
From: skaller <skaller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: readline license (was: [ANN] coThreads 0.10)
On Fri, 2007-09-21 at 18:33 +0200, Xavier Leroy wrote:

> >>Surely that's not a good reason anymore; there are non-GPL
> >>workalikes to readline().
> >
> >
> > Well one might ask Inria why they don't use it?
> (Just an aside: please say "the Caml development team" rather than
> "Inria", these are two different things.)

Sorry! Hmm .. is there a shorter form you'd find appropriate?

> So, yes, readline being GPL is a serious obstacle to using it within
> the OCaml toplevel.  More details in this old thread:
> This said, rlwrap works pretty well and I don't see many advantages to
> linking directly with readline.

I had no idea this program existed. I tried it an am impressed.

John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: