English version
Accueil     Ŕ propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis ŕ jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml ŕ l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
Search for the smallest possible possible Ocaml segfault....
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2007-11-08 (16:12)
From: Jeremy Yallop <jeremy.yallop@e...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Search for the smallest possible possible Ocaml segfault....
Jeremy Yallop wrote:
> Till Varoquaux wrote:
>> I have a  open bug in ocaml
>> (http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=4321) that leads very simply
>> to a segfault. The bug has been there for more than 4 months and is
>> still marked as "new". Since it seems to be stalling I thought I might
>> give it a gentle prod: what is the smallest possible ocaml program you
>> can come up with that leads to a reproducible segfault without using
>> FFI's Obj or Marshal. Here is mine:
>> Scanf.sscanf  "\"%2$c%1$s\"" "%{%c%s%}" (fun f->Printf.printf f 'x' 
>> "xy");;
> I've already reported this (on the mailing list) and it's probably been 
> fixed by now, but in OCaml 3.10.0:
>      !((object val virtual x:'a method x=x end)#x)

I made it shorter:

        !((object val virtual x:_ method x=x end)#x)