Version française
Home     About     Download     Resources     Contact us    

This site is updated infrequently. For up-to-date information, please visit the new OCaml website at

Browse thread
Metaprogramming features
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2008-10-03 (16:01)
From: David Teller <David.Teller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Metaprogramming features
Gasp, lobbying on this list ? :)

I strongly agree with that feature request. One reason is  all the code
which is currently in Camlp4 but actually deserves the MetaOCaml
treatment. The other reason is that I believe that the Haskell vs. OCaml
race matters.


On Fri, 2008-10-03 at 10:34 -0400, Jacques Carette wrote:

> Note that OCaml could be really ahead of Haskell here (with its untyped
> Template Haskell, which is closer to camlp4 than to metaocaml) by being
> the first production language to have _typed_ metaprogramming facilities.
> ===================
> This feature request is currently the entry in Mantis which has (by far!) the largest number of comments from separate people, as well as now being the entry with the most comments overall.  
> Please add your voice to the chorus!
> Jacques

David Teller-Rajchenbach
 Security of Distributed Systems
 Angry researcher: French Universities need reforms, but the LRU act brings liquidations.