<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<!DOCTYPE message PUBLIC
  "-//MLarc//DTD MLarc output files//EN"
  "../../mlarc.dtd"[
  <!ATTLIST message
    listname CDATA #REQUIRED
    title CDATA #REQUIRED
  >
]>

  <?xml-stylesheet href="../../mlarc.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>


<message 
  url="2009/01/484729b8c91b7ed08f7a809ef4800784"
  from="Jon Harrop &lt;jon@f...&gt;"
  author="Jon Harrop"
  date="2009-01-17T16:55:53"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?"
  prev="2009/01/e4b1f2ea536665130434f46b955e0a2a"
  next="2009/01/bc0b728019ecc0ed06c6c620d4829306"
  prev-in-thread="2009/01/9830bc229413613d2df787f6c4190432"
  next-in-thread="2009/01/bc0b728019ecc0ed06c6c620d4829306"
  prev-thread="2009/01/7d9ffe8f9682d9fa8b4a85b38c339f33"
  next-thread="2009/01/000cddff1b409b39cd14cc392083ce8a"
  root="../../"
  period="month"
  listname="caml-list"
  title="Archives of the Caml mailing list">

<thread subject="C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/f038b8a453e89bfa6350495a826080fe"
  from="Kuba Ober &lt;ober.14@o...&gt;"
  author="Kuba Ober"
  date="2009-01-16T15:18:51"
  subject="C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/7f3ed02f83caca6c67c43c70d569e674"
  from="Richard Jones &lt;rich@a...&gt;"
  author="Richard Jones"
  date="2009-01-16T15:58:08"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/62a2d4cfa48d2f7cdc9e412c097ea6e8"
  from="Jan Kybic &lt;kybic@f...&gt;"
  author="Jan Kybic"
  date="2009-01-16T16:29:10"
  subject="On the benefits of OO, Was: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/c69523eaafbcbe2312b568706d7a7c98"
  from="Oliver Bandel &lt;oliver@f...&gt;"
  author="Oliver Bandel"
  date="2009-01-17T12:40:24"
  subject="Re: On the benefits of OO, Was: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2009/01/6cca6c9feefd88566702defdd9eb4640"
  from="Raoul Duke &lt;raould@g...&gt;"
  author="Raoul Duke"
  date="2009-01-16T18:27:41"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/5977e5c50685f9511c2a7aaeb88f2aaa"
  from="Kuba Ober &lt;ober.14@o...&gt;"
  author="Kuba Ober"
  date="2009-01-16T21:42:40"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/1688f5de4636fc2a074a556bdd4e13c5"
  from="Sashan Govender &lt;sashang@g...&gt;"
  author="Sashan Govender"
  date="2009-01-17T03:14:40"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/3da7c22bc8951acf11dc387c75d70ce3"
  from="Kuba Ober &lt;ober.14@o...&gt;"
  author="Kuba Ober"
  date="2009-01-17T14:07:23"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/0d0df2a5f73e6806a082ed1385428205"
  from="Stefano Zacchiroli &lt;zack@u...&gt;"
  author="Stefano Zacchiroli"
  date="2009-01-18T06:24:43"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2009/01/bf9090ae9b10f70576fe56884cc0bb1d"
  from="Jon Harrop &lt;jon@f...&gt;"
  author="Jon Harrop"
  date="2009-01-17T13:23:25"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/9830bc229413613d2df787f6c4190432"
  from="Kuba Ober &lt;ober.14@o...&gt;"
  author="Kuba Ober"
  date="2009-01-17T14:35:25"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/484729b8c91b7ed08f7a809ef4800784"
  from="Jon Harrop &lt;jon@f...&gt;"
  author="Jon Harrop"
  date="2009-01-17T16:55:53"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/bc0b728019ecc0ed06c6c620d4829306"
  from="Kuba Ober &lt;ober.14@o...&gt;"
  author="Kuba Ober"
  date="2009-01-17T21:22:22"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/b83f81eef8ccb535ebb9797ff38dee68"
  from="Jon Harrop &lt;jon@f...&gt;"
  author="Jon Harrop"
  date="2009-01-17T22:14:04"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/e6aec16698cc330e90186b9637b316b6"
  from="David Teller &lt;David.Teller@u...&gt;"
  author="David Teller"
  date="2009-01-17T23:29:08"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/81422a330b59f6967afaba609aa0aa1c"
  from="Jon Harrop &lt;jon@f...&gt;"
  author="Jon Harrop"
  date="2009-01-17T23:46:02"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2009/01/9d3495098b6736864d7a911f80eacf02"
  from="Yoann Padioleau &lt;padator@w...&gt;"
  author="Yoann Padioleau"
  date="2009-01-19T16:22:12"
  subject="Visitor in OCaml [was Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?]">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/15619ef0d6556c727c807856c0540121"
  from="blue storm &lt;bluestorm.dylc@g...&gt;"
  author="blue storm"
  date="2009-01-19T16:41:37"
  subject="Re: Visitor in OCaml [was Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?]">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/982cca226b947ab9e2f9f544aa708026"
  from="Richard Jones &lt;rich@a...&gt;"
  author="Richard Jones"
  date="2009-01-19T17:49:27"
  subject="Re: Visitor in OCaml [was Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?]">
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2009/01/0eb7ca2a446affb91a9277e3c12af881"
  from="Christophe TROESTLER &lt;Christophe.Troestler+ocaml@u...&gt;"
  author="Christophe TROESTLER"
  date="2009-01-19T17:52:12"
  subject="Re: Visitor in OCaml">
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2009/01/bbed03c4ad81907e983814572437326f"
  from="Yoann Padioleau &lt;padator@w...&gt;"
  author="Yoann Padioleau"
  date="2009-01-21T20:09:07"
  subject="Re: Visitor in OCaml">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/9828bde42f61b10aa9f08a2126773cd0"
  from="Yaron Minsky &lt;yminsky@g...&gt;"
  author="Yaron Minsky"
  date="2009-01-22T04:03:22"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Re: Visitor in OCaml">
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</thread>

<contents>
On Saturday 17 January 2009 14:35:22 Kuba Ober wrote:
&gt; I wonder how such a hierarchy would be implemented in a natural way
&gt; in OCaml?

Assuming you stick with accepted wisdom, you would mimic the same effects 
using OCaml's object system, just as LablGTK does. However, you have picked 
the only pedagogical OO example: GUI widgets.

In contrast, metaprogramming is the pedagogical example for algebraic 
datatypes. There is almost no need for users to extend the abstract syntax 
tree but there is huge value in being able to rewrite expressions using 
pattern matching. There is an idiomatic OOP solution to this problem that 
involves visitor patterns and so forth but it is comparatively verbose, 
obfuscated and unmaintainable.

-- 
Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e

</contents>

</message>

