<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<!DOCTYPE message PUBLIC
  "-//MLarc//DTD MLarc output files//EN"
  "../../mlarc.dtd"[
  <!ATTLIST message
    listname CDATA #REQUIRED
    title CDATA #REQUIRED
  >
]>

  <?xml-stylesheet href="../../mlarc.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>


<message 
  url="2009/01/4ed490718e7f3fa7b1ab4ad1c56629c6"
  from="Jon Harrop &lt;jon@f...&gt;"
  author="Jon Harrop"
  date="2009-01-25T05:17:19"
  subject="JIT compilation of OCaml&apos;s bytecode"
  prev="2009/01/3c11c69d244b7b371e09b87b1d569911"
  next="2009/01/fc0d9042cca25bef993a5587344ce940"
  next-in-thread="2009/01/fc0d9042cca25bef993a5587344ce940"
  prev-thread="2009/01/a7ff6f96420ea126da027e3f06d95313"
  next-thread="2009/01/9912c0d7556d1bea5bb7d407674e98fb"
  root="../../"
  period="month"
  listname="caml-list"
  title="Archives of the Caml mailing list">

<thread subject="JIT compilation of OCaml&apos;s bytecode">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/4ed490718e7f3fa7b1ab4ad1c56629c6"
  from="Jon Harrop &lt;jon@f...&gt;"
  author="Jon Harrop"
  date="2009-01-25T05:17:19"
  subject="JIT compilation of OCaml&apos;s bytecode">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/fc0d9042cca25bef993a5587344ce940"
  from="Mikkel_Fahnøe_Jørgensen &lt;mikkel@d...&gt;"
  author="Mikkel_Fahnøe_Jørgensen"
  date="2009-01-25T08:27:24"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] JIT compilation of OCaml&apos;s bytecode">
</msg>
</msg>
</thread>

<contents>

AFAIK, OCaml's bytecode is typeless. How hard would it be to infer types from 
the bytecode in order to create type-specific functions during JIT 
compilation?

-- 
Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e

</contents>

</message>

