<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<!DOCTYPE message PUBLIC
  "-//MLarc//DTD MLarc output files//EN"
  "../../mlarc.dtd"[
  <!ATTLIST message
    listname CDATA #REQUIRED
    title CDATA #REQUIRED
  >
]>

  <?xml-stylesheet href="../../mlarc.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>


<message 
  url="2009/01/521ae12c093f87e36498da99ae549e1b"
  from="David Teller &lt;David.Teller@m...&gt;"
  author="David Teller"
  date="2009-01-28T21:18:29"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Defining a family of functors"
  prev="2009/01/4ec57fa817e7ef6cf9c31bb4deed5536"
  next="2009/01/2c2fd1964e515642442ce233e9583c32"
  prev-in-thread="2009/01/1753e428b7e5e27bce761f4376dcfc36"
  next-in-thread="2009/01/ce1c7eaeee72626fbebda727986324b6"
  prev-thread="2009/01/075c78daae5e116a1bb9600fe4622e71"
  next-thread="2009/01/058fceaf7ab816b8e53ee025d7e00cb1"
  root="../../"
  period="month"
  listname="caml-list"
  title="Archives of the Caml mailing list">

<thread subject="Defining a family of functors">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/f7ca13d9cc4ee13a6a08d9db855b9cb7"
  from="Michaël_Grünewald &lt;michaelgrunewald@y...&gt;"
  author="Michaël_Grünewald"
  date="2009-01-26T15:08:38"
  subject="Defining a family of functors">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/3ac0c3210d8125d897f761fbf92e4bd8"
  from="Jacques Carette &lt;carette@m...&gt;"
  author="Jacques Carette"
  date="2009-01-26T15:16:34"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Defining a family of functors">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/d2c63b2f7626796ec90499b50f2cf5a5"
  from="Andrej Bauer &lt;andrej.bauer@a...&gt;"
  author="Andrej Bauer"
  date="2009-01-27T14:30:29"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Defining a family of functors">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/e0c885a82a80905f27ea953e549edbf7"
  from="Jacques Carette &lt;carette@m...&gt;"
  author="Jacques Carette"
  date="2009-01-27T14:48:20"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Defining a family of functors">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/8d8e54f793872ffd56af17cf4847374b"
  from="David Teller &lt;David.Teller@m...&gt;"
  author="David Teller"
  date="2009-01-27T21:12:52"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Defining a family of functors">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/1753e428b7e5e27bce761f4376dcfc36"
  from="Nicolas Pouillard &lt;nicolas.pouillard@g...&gt;"
  author="Nicolas Pouillard"
  date="2009-01-28T00:33:36"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Defining a family of functors">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/521ae12c093f87e36498da99ae549e1b"
  from="David Teller &lt;David.Teller@m...&gt;"
  author="David Teller"
  date="2009-01-28T21:18:29"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Defining a family of functors">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/ce1c7eaeee72626fbebda727986324b6"
  from=""
  author=""
  date="2009-01-29T09:38:48"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Defining a family of functors">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/d1e905442fb5ce55cfc4baef864b75cc"
  from="David Allsopp &lt;dra-news@m...&gt;"
  author="David Allsopp"
  date="2009-01-29T10:41:14"
  subject="RE: [Caml-list] Defining a family of functors">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/084cca644aebe0a7eee115861cf4acae"
  from="Mauricio Fernandez &lt;mfp@a...&gt;"
  author="Mauricio Fernandez"
  date="2009-01-29T21:15:00"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Defining a family of functors">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/05f780a2c38623a81af65fd384bb7637"
  from="Michaël_Grünewald &lt;michaelgrunewald@y...&gt;"
  author="Michaël_Grünewald"
  date="2009-01-30T08:25:30"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Defining a family of functors">
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</thread>

<contents>
On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 01:32 +0100, Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
&gt; The encoding of modules using existential types in non modular, this
&gt; basically means that you have to heavily transform the source.
&gt; 
&gt; What one need to encode modules is "open" existential types, this well
&gt; and clearly explained in this POPL'09 paper:
&gt; 
&gt;   Â«Modeling Abstract Types in Modules with Open Existential TypesÂ»,
&gt;     by BenoÃ®t Montagu and Didier RÃ©my

Yes, I was just reading that paper. However, it is my impression that we
could get away without open existential types, at the cost of reduced
features.

On the other hand, it was pointed to me that Alain already wrote a
compiler patch implementing first-class modules.

Cheers,
 David

</contents>

</message>

