<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<!DOCTYPE message PUBLIC
  "-//MLarc//DTD MLarc output files//EN"
  "../../mlarc.dtd"[
  <!ATTLIST message
    listname CDATA #REQUIRED
    title CDATA #REQUIRED
  >
]>

  <?xml-stylesheet href="../../mlarc.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>


<message 
  url="2009/01/8f1e4eab0fdeb3b2117abc79bd9429c0"
  from="Jon Harrop &lt;jon@f...&gt;"
  author="Jon Harrop"
  date="2009-01-27T14:07:10"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Tail calls in the JVM and the OCamlJava project"
  prev="2009/01/4dde087f77a6b975d39f14564b969577"
  next="2009/01/d2c63b2f7626796ec90499b50f2cf5a5"
  prev-in-thread="2009/01/4dde087f77a6b975d39f14564b969577"
  next-in-thread="2009/01/176083d907711b1c0f7c0efd6b51cc93"
  prev-thread="2009/01/0a0fe39588aae49654160bac6ca678bc"
  next-thread="2009/01/6bcb9a4ac2176599c516764078bcdc49"
  root="../../"
  period="month"
  listname="caml-list"
  title="Archives of the Caml mailing list">

<thread subject="Tail calls in the JVM and the OCamlJava project">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/f5bd2d6c64c874aac998705e20700717"
  from="Jon Harrop &lt;jon@f...&gt;"
  author="Jon Harrop"
  date="2009-01-26T23:10:25"
  subject="Tail calls in the JVM and the OCamlJava project">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/4dde087f77a6b975d39f14564b969577"
  from="forum@x..."
  author="forum@x..."
  date="2009-01-27T08:36:04"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Tail calls in the JVM and the OCamlJava project">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/8f1e4eab0fdeb3b2117abc79bd9429c0"
  from="Jon Harrop &lt;jon@f...&gt;"
  author="Jon Harrop"
  date="2009-01-27T14:07:10"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Tail calls in the JVM and the OCamlJava project">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/176083d907711b1c0f7c0efd6b51cc93"
  from="forum@x..."
  author="forum@x..."
  date="2009-01-27T14:42:17"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Tail calls in the JVM and the OCamlJava project">
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2009/01/61637113b8c509a660eb92246d3ccff4"
  from="Jon Harrop &lt;jon@f...&gt;"
  author="Jon Harrop"
  date="2009-01-31T00:13:56"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Tail calls in the JVM and the OCamlJava project">
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</thread>

<contents>
On Tuesday 27 January 2009 08:36:23 forum@x9c.fr wrote:
&gt;   - more aggressive unboxing of values, like in ocamlopt (**).

Can you elaborate on this? Surely boxing is no longer an issue thanks to JIT 
compilation?

On a related note, the new code generator in Mono 2.2 has made F# Mono as fast 
as OCaml on SciMark2. So a Mono backend might be a viable option.

-- 
Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e

</contents>

</message>

