<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<!DOCTYPE message PUBLIC
  "-//MLarc//DTD MLarc output files//EN"
  "../../mlarc.dtd"[
  <!ATTLIST message
    listname CDATA #REQUIRED
    title CDATA #REQUIRED
  >
]>

  <?xml-stylesheet href="../../mlarc.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>


<message 
  url="2009/01/bf9090ae9b10f70576fe56884cc0bb1d"
  from="Jon Harrop &lt;jon@f...&gt;"
  author="Jon Harrop"
  date="2009-01-17T13:23:25"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?"
  prev="2009/01/c69523eaafbcbe2312b568706d7a7c98"
  next="2009/01/3da7c22bc8951acf11dc387c75d70ce3"
  prev-in-thread="2009/01/0d0df2a5f73e6806a082ed1385428205"
  next-in-thread="2009/01/9830bc229413613d2df787f6c4190432"
  prev-thread="2009/01/7d9ffe8f9682d9fa8b4a85b38c339f33"
  next-thread="2009/01/000cddff1b409b39cd14cc392083ce8a"
  root="../../"
  period="month"
  listname="caml-list"
  title="Archives of the Caml mailing list">

<thread subject="C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/f038b8a453e89bfa6350495a826080fe"
  from="Kuba Ober &lt;ober.14@o...&gt;"
  author="Kuba Ober"
  date="2009-01-16T15:18:51"
  subject="C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/7f3ed02f83caca6c67c43c70d569e674"
  from="Richard Jones &lt;rich@a...&gt;"
  author="Richard Jones"
  date="2009-01-16T15:58:08"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/62a2d4cfa48d2f7cdc9e412c097ea6e8"
  from="Jan Kybic &lt;kybic@f...&gt;"
  author="Jan Kybic"
  date="2009-01-16T16:29:10"
  subject="On the benefits of OO, Was: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/c69523eaafbcbe2312b568706d7a7c98"
  from="Oliver Bandel &lt;oliver@f...&gt;"
  author="Oliver Bandel"
  date="2009-01-17T12:40:24"
  subject="Re: On the benefits of OO, Was: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2009/01/6cca6c9feefd88566702defdd9eb4640"
  from="Raoul Duke &lt;raould@g...&gt;"
  author="Raoul Duke"
  date="2009-01-16T18:27:41"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/5977e5c50685f9511c2a7aaeb88f2aaa"
  from="Kuba Ober &lt;ober.14@o...&gt;"
  author="Kuba Ober"
  date="2009-01-16T21:42:40"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/1688f5de4636fc2a074a556bdd4e13c5"
  from="Sashan Govender &lt;sashang@g...&gt;"
  author="Sashan Govender"
  date="2009-01-17T03:14:40"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/3da7c22bc8951acf11dc387c75d70ce3"
  from="Kuba Ober &lt;ober.14@o...&gt;"
  author="Kuba Ober"
  date="2009-01-17T14:07:23"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/0d0df2a5f73e6806a082ed1385428205"
  from="Stefano Zacchiroli &lt;zack@u...&gt;"
  author="Stefano Zacchiroli"
  date="2009-01-18T06:24:43"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2009/01/bf9090ae9b10f70576fe56884cc0bb1d"
  from="Jon Harrop &lt;jon@f...&gt;"
  author="Jon Harrop"
  date="2009-01-17T13:23:25"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/9830bc229413613d2df787f6c4190432"
  from="Kuba Ober &lt;ober.14@o...&gt;"
  author="Kuba Ober"
  date="2009-01-17T14:35:25"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/484729b8c91b7ed08f7a809ef4800784"
  from="Jon Harrop &lt;jon@f...&gt;"
  author="Jon Harrop"
  date="2009-01-17T16:55:53"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/bc0b728019ecc0ed06c6c620d4829306"
  from="Kuba Ober &lt;ober.14@o...&gt;"
  author="Kuba Ober"
  date="2009-01-17T21:22:22"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/b83f81eef8ccb535ebb9797ff38dee68"
  from="Jon Harrop &lt;jon@f...&gt;"
  author="Jon Harrop"
  date="2009-01-17T22:14:04"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/e6aec16698cc330e90186b9637b316b6"
  from="David Teller &lt;David.Teller@u...&gt;"
  author="David Teller"
  date="2009-01-17T23:29:08"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/81422a330b59f6967afaba609aa0aa1c"
  from="Jon Harrop &lt;jon@f...&gt;"
  author="Jon Harrop"
  date="2009-01-17T23:46:02"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?">
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2009/01/9d3495098b6736864d7a911f80eacf02"
  from="Yoann Padioleau &lt;padator@w...&gt;"
  author="Yoann Padioleau"
  date="2009-01-19T16:22:12"
  subject="Visitor in OCaml [was Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?]">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/15619ef0d6556c727c807856c0540121"
  from="blue storm &lt;bluestorm.dylc@g...&gt;"
  author="blue storm"
  date="2009-01-19T16:41:37"
  subject="Re: Visitor in OCaml [was Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?]">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/982cca226b947ab9e2f9f544aa708026"
  from="Richard Jones &lt;rich@a...&gt;"
  author="Richard Jones"
  date="2009-01-19T17:49:27"
  subject="Re: Visitor in OCaml [was Re: [Caml-list] C++/C# inheritance is bad?]">
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2009/01/0eb7ca2a446affb91a9277e3c12af881"
  from="Christophe TROESTLER &lt;Christophe.Troestler+ocaml@u...&gt;"
  author="Christophe TROESTLER"
  date="2009-01-19T17:52:12"
  subject="Re: Visitor in OCaml">
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2009/01/bbed03c4ad81907e983814572437326f"
  from="Yoann Padioleau &lt;padator@w...&gt;"
  author="Yoann Padioleau"
  date="2009-01-21T20:09:07"
  subject="Re: Visitor in OCaml">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/9828bde42f61b10aa9f08a2126773cd0"
  from="Yaron Minsky &lt;yminsky@g...&gt;"
  author="Yaron Minsky"
  date="2009-01-22T04:03:22"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Re: Visitor in OCaml">
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</thread>

<contents>
On Friday 16 January 2009 15:18:50 Kuba Ober wrote:
&gt; So, when correctly applied, what's so disturbing about inheritance?

Inheritance is disturbing because, in general, it cannot be applied correctly. 
That is why there are so many workarounds, many of which do not even exist in 
C++ like final methods, sealed classes, multimethods, extractors and so on. 
OO is not good in all circumstances and other tools can be preferable. IME, 
OO is only very rarely the best solution and it is only chosen so often 
because it is typically the only solution available (e.g. in C++ or Java).

&gt; You inherit only where it makes sense, and if it makes sense then you don't
&gt; care about which particular method is called: it's supposed to be safe.

Safety is quite different from easy of use, of course.

-- 
Dr Jon Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy Ltd.
http://www.ffconsultancy.com/?e

</contents>

</message>

