<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<!DOCTYPE message PUBLIC
  "-//MLarc//DTD MLarc output files//EN"
  "../../mlarc.dtd"[
  <!ATTLIST message
    listname CDATA #REQUIRED
    title CDATA #REQUIRED
  >
]>

  <?xml-stylesheet href="../../mlarc.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>


<message 
  url="2009/01/ce1c7eaeee72626fbebda727986324b6"
  from=""
  author=""
  date="2009-01-29T09:38:48"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Defining a family of functors"
  prev="2009/01/2ab9cc0e7892983f6930f81e8d176fb6"
  next="2009/01/f3780368d903fd5b446912f2fbeb70e1"
  prev-in-thread="2009/01/521ae12c093f87e36498da99ae549e1b"
  next-in-thread="2009/01/d1e905442fb5ce55cfc4baef864b75cc"
  prev-thread="2009/01/075c78daae5e116a1bb9600fe4622e71"
  next-thread="2009/01/058fceaf7ab816b8e53ee025d7e00cb1"
  root="../../"
  period="month"
  listname="caml-list"
  title="Archives of the Caml mailing list">

<thread subject="Defining a family of functors">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/f7ca13d9cc4ee13a6a08d9db855b9cb7"
  from="Michaël_Grünewald &lt;michaelgrunewald@y...&gt;"
  author="Michaël_Grünewald"
  date="2009-01-26T15:08:38"
  subject="Defining a family of functors">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/3ac0c3210d8125d897f761fbf92e4bd8"
  from="Jacques Carette &lt;carette@m...&gt;"
  author="Jacques Carette"
  date="2009-01-26T15:16:34"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Defining a family of functors">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/d2c63b2f7626796ec90499b50f2cf5a5"
  from="Andrej Bauer &lt;andrej.bauer@a...&gt;"
  author="Andrej Bauer"
  date="2009-01-27T14:30:29"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Defining a family of functors">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/e0c885a82a80905f27ea953e549edbf7"
  from="Jacques Carette &lt;carette@m...&gt;"
  author="Jacques Carette"
  date="2009-01-27T14:48:20"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Defining a family of functors">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/8d8e54f793872ffd56af17cf4847374b"
  from="David Teller &lt;David.Teller@m...&gt;"
  author="David Teller"
  date="2009-01-27T21:12:52"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Defining a family of functors">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/1753e428b7e5e27bce761f4376dcfc36"
  from="Nicolas Pouillard &lt;nicolas.pouillard@g...&gt;"
  author="Nicolas Pouillard"
  date="2009-01-28T00:33:36"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Defining a family of functors">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/521ae12c093f87e36498da99ae549e1b"
  from="David Teller &lt;David.Teller@m...&gt;"
  author="David Teller"
  date="2009-01-28T21:18:29"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Defining a family of functors">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/ce1c7eaeee72626fbebda727986324b6"
  from=""
  author=""
  date="2009-01-29T09:38:48"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Defining a family of functors">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/d1e905442fb5ce55cfc4baef864b75cc"
  from="David Allsopp &lt;dra-news@m...&gt;"
  author="David Allsopp"
  date="2009-01-29T10:41:14"
  subject="RE: [Caml-list] Defining a family of functors">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/084cca644aebe0a7eee115861cf4acae"
  from="Mauricio Fernandez &lt;mfp@a...&gt;"
  author="Mauricio Fernandez"
  date="2009-01-29T21:15:00"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Defining a family of functors">
<msg 
  url="2009/01/05f780a2c38623a81af65fd384bb7637"
  from="Michaël_Grünewald &lt;michaelgrunewald@y...&gt;"
  author="Michaël_Grünewald"
  date="2009-01-30T08:25:30"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Defining a family of functors">
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</msg>
</thread>

<contents>
Excerpts from David Teller's message of Wed Jan 28 12:25:26 +0100 2009:
&gt; On Wed, 2009-01-28 at 01:32 +0100, Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
&gt; &gt; The encoding of modules using existential types in non modular, this
&gt; &gt; basically means that you have to heavily transform the source.
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt; What one need to encode modules is "open" existential types, this well
&gt; &gt; and clearly explained in this POPL'09 paper:
&gt; &gt; 
&gt; &gt;   Â«Modeling Abstract Types in Modules with Open Existential TypesÂ»,
&gt; &gt;     by BenoÃ®t Montagu and Didier RÃ©my
&gt; 
&gt; Yes, I was just reading that paper. However, it is my impression that we
&gt; could get away without open existential types, at the cost of reduced
&gt; features.
&gt; 
&gt; On the other hand, it was pointed to me that Alain already wrote a
&gt; compiler patch implementing first-class modules.

That's right.

-- 
Nicolas Pouillard

</contents>

</message>

