English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
Wanted: your feedback on the hierarchy of OCaml Batteries Included
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2009-01-05 (20:20)
From: David Teller <David.Teller@u...>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Wanted: your feedback on the hierarchy of OCaml Batteries Included
     Hi Benedikt,

 You're right, we should make this kind of decision. For the moment, we
are focusing on different issues (e.g. standardising I/O, enumerations,
module names, etc), in an effort to obtain a base relatively fast,
something which could be tested both with existing code and new
applications. It is our hope that this will yield enough interest for
people to comment and discuss policies regarding exceptions, labels,


On Fri, 2008-12-19 at 11:00 +0000, Benedikt Grundmann wrote:
> Somehow I forgot reply back when you posted this reply.  And I was just
> reminded when I read this:
> "Batteries is meant to serve the following purposes:
>  [snip]
> provide consistent abstractions and APIs for otherwise independent libraries.
> "
> on
> http://wiki.cocan.org/events/europe/ocamlmeetinggrenoble2009
> How can you expect to provide consistent abstractions if you are
> not willing to make those decisions?
> Cheers,
> Bene

David Teller-Rajchenbach
 Security of Distributed Systems
   Latest News of French Research: System being liquidated. Researchers