<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<!DOCTYPE message PUBLIC
  "-//MLarc//DTD MLarc output files//EN"
  "../../mlarc.dtd"[
  <!ATTLIST message
    listname CDATA #REQUIRED
    title CDATA #REQUIRED
  >
]>

  <?xml-stylesheet href="../../mlarc.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>


<message 
  url="2009/10/df4a6df06a68d7b65fc88ce7b1fe0289"
  from="Vincent Aravantinos &lt;vincent.aravantinos@g...&gt;"
  author="Vincent Aravantinos"
  date="2009-10-09T14:45:08"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Improving OCaml&apos;s choice of type to display"
  prev="2009/10/0880e1b35fd2d07cead92a1871df73b7"
  next="2009/10/0328a8af6bfbcd9e0150e7be86ab0338"
  prev-in-thread="2009/10/0880e1b35fd2d07cead92a1871df73b7"
  next-in-thread="2009/10/0328a8af6bfbcd9e0150e7be86ab0338"
  prev-thread="2009/10/1b087dcc1f0f6132c02c68dbbb67bc95"
  next-thread="2009/10/2a3b947aa9b77f6b0e4558b8fd0b4984"
  root="../../"
  period="month"
  listname="caml-list"
  title="Archives of the Caml mailing list">

<thread subject="Re: [Caml-list] Improving OCaml&apos;s choice of type to display">
<msg 
  url="2009/10/0880e1b35fd2d07cead92a1871df73b7"
  from="Damien Guichard &lt;alphablock@o...&gt;"
  author="Damien Guichard"
  date="2009-10-09T14:18:47"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Improving OCaml&apos;s choice of type to display">
<msg 
  url="2009/10/df4a6df06a68d7b65fc88ce7b1fe0289"
  from="Vincent Aravantinos &lt;vincent.aravantinos@g...&gt;"
  author="Vincent Aravantinos"
  date="2009-10-09T14:45:08"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Improving OCaml&apos;s choice of type to display">
<msg 
  url="2009/10/0328a8af6bfbcd9e0150e7be86ab0338"
  from="David Allsopp &lt;dra-news@m...&gt;"
  author="David Allsopp"
  date="2009-10-09T15:28:08"
  subject="RE: [Caml-list] Improving OCaml&apos;s choice of type to display">
</msg>
</msg>
<msg 
  url="2009/10/7c6d3ad6bfb93955eefdc3f0a47a181a"
  from="Yaron Minsky &lt;yminsky@g...&gt;"
  author="Yaron Minsky"
  date="2009-10-09T16:52:41"
  subject="Re: [Caml-list] Improving OCaml&apos;s choice of type to display">
</msg>
</msg>
</thread>

<contents>
Hi,

can't you just say that you spotted a problem in the proposed solution  
instead of being so aggressive?

Removing all the useless sentences of your message just leave this:

Le 9 oct. 09 à 16:18, Damien Guichard a écrit :

&gt; Imagine my code is:
&gt;
&gt;   type color = int
&gt;
&gt;   let black : color = 0
&gt;
&gt; Then, following your proposition, evaluating black should give me an  
&gt; int rather than a color because int is shorter and therefore nicer.


which is indeed relevant and exposes a problem not faced in the  
previous mails.

Thanks,
V.
</contents>

</message>

