English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
OCamlJit 2.0
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2010-11-20 (11:49)
From: Jon Harrop <jonathandeanharrop@g...>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Native toplevel? (was: OCamlJit 2.0)
Also for interactive data massaging and visualization.


From: caml-list-bounces@yquem.inria.fr
[mailto:caml-list-bounces@yquem.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Ashish Agarwal
Sent: 18 November 2010 16:50
To: Alain Frisch
Cc: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Native toplevel? (was: OCamlJit 2.0)


On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:44 AM, Alain Frisch <alain@frisch.fr> wrote:

Does performance really matter that much for rapid prototyping/development?


Rapid prototyping for me often involves a couple of lines of code that read
in a very large file and do something with it. I have to keep compiling
these small programs to native code because the performance of the toplevel
is too slow. Then, I have to recompile and re-read the whole file for every
little additional thing I want to compute. A high-performance toplevel would
help in this kind of work.