English version
Accueil     À propos     Téléchargement     Ressources     Contactez-nous    

Ce site est rarement mis à jour. Pour les informations les plus récentes, rendez-vous sur le nouveau site OCaml à l'adresse ocaml.org.

Browse thread
OCamlJIT2 vs. OCamlJIT
[ Home ] [ Index: by date | by threads ]
[ Search: ]

[ Message by date: previous | next ] [ Message in thread: previous | next ] [ Thread: previous | next ]
Date: 2010-12-03 (21:45)
From: Philippe Strauss <philou@p...>
Subject: Re: ocamlopt LLVM support (Was: [Caml-list] OCamlJIT2 vs. OCamlJIT)
mostly fftw using christophe troessler binding and a kind of plain convolution, actully very comparable to plain convolution 100% in caml (not using any c binding).

plus minor things like binary search, vector multiplications etc. (audio DSP).

Le 3 déc. 2010 à 22:22, Jon Harrop a écrit :

> Philippe wrote:
>> I'm totally noob on compilers internals, but if the processing of float
>> arrays can be improved a lot by a LLVM ocamlopt, I would use it
>> exclusively.
> LLVM's x86 code gen will generate more efficient floating point code than
> ocamlopt if and only if the type information is available to it. With
> OCaml's current design, that is unlikely and you'll still have things like
> the 16Mb limit.
> What algorithms are you running?
> Cheers,
> Jon.